Depretiate

　　In fact, no matter how you think about it, the website is wrong? I don't keep my promise at all. It's just that the website has always been like this. It never gives you any communication opportunities, feedback conditions and so on. Just like other overlord terms websites, they don't talk about any rules at all. Maybe fortunately, I know which articles are not passed.

　　Even this group, I don't know why I can't think of them. What's the matter If you back up your articles a little, you won't know which one has been rejected. In my opinion, there can't be an article written in vain, unless it's popular science in other places. Then I understand that he has dealt with it. You can put it on other websites in the future. It's a pity if you waste it.

　　So even if the website is not in line with the responsibility, there is no way to do it. Originally, it is not trustworthy at all, and it is meaningless to know his proposition and composition. Another interesting thing is to find that other people are beginning to talk nonsense, but it's not yet the process. I don't want to do that.

　　Anyway? Since I found this method, even if it doesn't increase itself, well, it's very good to say that. It's artificial. It's not deceptive.